Unilateral Spinal vs General Anaesthesia in Low EF Patients: A Hemodynamic Comparison
Enrolling by invitation
Conditions studied: Hemodynamic (MAP) Stability
In brief
A difference exists in intraoperative hemodynamic stability and vasopressor requirement between the two techniques
Key facts
- Study ID
- NCT07752303
- Run by
- Sargodha Medical College
- People needed
- 78
- Starts
- 2026-07-05
- Expected to finish
- 2026-12-01
- Last updated by the study team
- 2026-08-10
Who can join
Age: 18 and older, up to 70. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.
You may qualify if…
- Patient Age/Gender : 18-70 Years Male / Female. 2 Elective lower-limb surgery 3. Patients with reduced Ejection Fraction: rEF ( 35-40%) 4 ASA Class II-III
You may not qualify if…
- Emergency surgery.
- Coagulopathy.
- Spinal deformity or infection.
- Drug allergy.
- Severe pulmonary disease VI. Psychiatric and Neurological Illness. VII. BMI > 35 kg/m² VIII. Allergic to local anaesthetic agents
Where it is running
- Dr Faisal Masood teaching Hospital sargodha — Sargodha, Pakistan
Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.