Comparison of Erector Spinae Plane Block and Modified Pectoral Fascial Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery

Enrolling by invitation · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Congenital Heart Disease, Postoperative Pain After Cardiac Surgery Via Median Sternotomy, Anesthesia

In brief

Postoperative pain management is an essential component of perioperative care in pediatric congenital cardiac surgery. Regional anesthesia techniques, including the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and modified pectoral fascial plane block (M-PFPB), are increasingly used as part of multimodal analgesia; however, evidence directly comparing these techniques in pediatric cardiac surgery remains limited. This prospective randomized controlled study aims to compare the analgesic efficacy of ESPB and M-PFPB in pediatric patients undergoing elective congenital cardiac surgery. The primary objective is to identify the regional anesthesia technique associated with more effective postoperative pain control. Secondary objectives include comparison of perioperative opioid consumption, hemodynamic parameters, extubation time, postoperative pain scores, perioperative complications, and intensive care unit and hospital length of stay. The findings are expected to contribute to the optimization of perioperative analgesia protocols and improve postoperative recovery in pediatric cardiac surgery.

Key facts

Study ID
NCT07740915
Run by
Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gazi Yasargil Training and Research Hospital
People needed
40
Starts
2026-06-30
Expected to finish
2026-08-30
Last updated by the study team
2026-08-03

Who can join

Age: any, up to 18. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.