Cost-utility Analysis of Outpatient Manual Vacuum Aspiration Versus Operating Room Electric Aspiration for the Management of First-trimester Miscarriage
Starting soon · Not applicable
Conditions studied: Miscarriage, Pregnancy Loss, First Trimester Pregnancy
In brief
The ASPIR study aims to evaluate the cost-utility of outpatient manual vacuum aspiration compared with operating room electric aspiration for the management of first-trimester miscarriage. It is hypothesized that manual aspiration will demonstrate equivalent clinical efficacy and patient quality of life while reducing healthcare costs.
Key facts
- Study ID
- NCT07732231
- Run by
- Nantes University Hospital
- People needed
- 860
- Starts
- 2026-10-01
- Expected to finish
- 2029-10-01
- Last updated by the study team
- 2026-07-28
Who can join
Age: 18 and older, up to 44. Sex: female. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.
You may qualify if…
- Female, aged 18-44 years
- Ultrasound-confirmed first-trimester miscarriage requiring surgical management
- Gestational age between 5 and 12 weeks of amenorrhea
- Incomplete spontaneous abortion or ongoing non-viable pregnancy
- Patient able to provide oral informed consent
You may not qualify if…
- Complete expulsion of pregnancy (endometrial thickness < 15 mm)
- Choice of medical treatment with misoprostol
- Elective termination of pregnancy
- Unwanted pregnancy
- Pregnancy of unknown location, molar pregnancy
- Known uterine malformation
- Prior surgical aspiration for the current pregnancy
- Intrauterine device in place
- Contraindicating medications (e.g. anticoagulants)
- Protected adults (under guardianship)
- Inability to complete study questionnaires
- Lack of social security coverage
- Haemorrhagic miscarriage
Where it is running
- CHU de Nantes — Nantes, France
Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.