Pipelle Versus Manual Vacuum Aspiration Cannula for Endometrial Biopsy in Women With Abnormal Uterine Bleeding

Starting soon · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Abnormal Uterine Bleeding (AUB)

In brief

women globally, often requiring endometrial tissue sampling for accurate evaluation and diagnosis. Traditional office-based sampling techniques like Pipelle are widely used, but the disposable instruments can be relatively expensive in resource-limited settings. Manual Vacuum Aspiration (MVA) using a flexible cannula is an inexpensive, reusable alternative, but clinical data comparing its performance directly to Pipelle remains limited. The objective of this randomized clinical trial is to compare Pipelle endometrial biopsy and Manual Vacuum Aspiration (MVA) cannula in terms of sample adequacy, patient satisfaction, and post-procedure complications in women presenting with abnormal uterine bleeding. Participants will be randomly assigned to undergo endometrial sampling using either a 4 mm MVA cannula or a Pipelle device without anesthesia or cervical dilation. Samples will be analyzed for histopathological diagnosis, and outcomes such as procedure pain, adequacy of tissue, and complications will be recorded.

Key facts

Study ID
NCT07731581
Run by
University of Health Sciences Lahore
People needed
80
Starts
2026-08-11
Expected to finish
2027-08-12
Last updated by the study team
2026-07-28

Who can join

Age: 35 and older. Sex: female. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.