CLE vs. ROSE for Ex Vivo Lung Biopsy Assessment

Recruiting now

Conditions studied: Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions (PPLs)

In brief

The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy (CLE) compared to Rapid On-Site Evaluation (ROSE) for ex vivo lung biopsy specimens obtained via bronchoscopy. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Does CLE provide diagnostic accuracy comparable to ROSE for the real-time assessment of peripheral pulmonary lesions? 2. What is the level of consistency between CLE-detected malignant architectural patterns and ROSE-identified atypical cells? Participants with peripheral pulmonary lesions (5-50 mm) undergoing navigational bronchoscopy will have their first retrieved biopsy specimen sequentially analyzed. The specimen will undergo CLE scanning first, followed immediately by ROSE cytology, before being fixed for final histopathological examination (the gold standard). CLE and ROSE interpreters will be blinded to the final pathological results and to each other's findings. Diagnostic performance, inter-modality agreement (using Kappa statistics), and procedure times will be analyzed to determine if CLE can serve as a non-consumptive alternative to ROSE.

Key facts

Study ID
NCT07725510
Run by
Guangzhou Medical University
People needed
30
Starts
2026-06-15
Expected to finish
2027-12-01
Last updated by the study team
2026-07-24

Who can join

Age: 18 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.