Flow Diverter Versus Conventional Endovascular Treatment for Unruptured Wide-Neck Bifurcation Aneurysms (FD-BWA Trial)

Recruiting now · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Unruptured Intracranial Wide-neck Bifurcation Aneurysms

In brief

Brief Summary: The goal of this clinical trial is to compare whether the traditional approach (stent-assisted coiling) is associated with a lower complication rate than flow diverter (Pipeline™) treatment for unruptured intracranial wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms. It will also evaluate the long-term imaging outcomes and safety of both treatments. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does the traditional approach result in a lower rate of any stroke or all-cause death within one year after treatment compared to the flow diverter? * What medical problems do participants experience during and after each treatment? * What are the imaging cure and stability rates at 1, 2, and 5 years after treatment? Researchers will compare the traditional approach (stent-assisted coiling) with the flow diverter (Pipeline™) to determine which treatment has better safety and efficacy outcomes. Participants will: * Be randomly assigned to receive either the flow diverter or traditional stent-assisted coiling * Undergo the assigned endovascular procedure * Return for follow-up visits at 30 days, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years after surgery for clinical assessments and imaging examinations (DSA, MRA, or CTA)

Key facts

Study ID
NCT07707076
Run by
Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
People needed
266
Starts
2026-02-10
Expected to finish
2030-06-30
Last updated by the study team
2026-07-16

Who can join

Age: 18 and older, up to 75. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.