Migration Rate for Continuous Adductor Canal Block Catheters After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Surgery: a Comparison Between Two Insertion Techniques

Starting soon · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Arthroplasty Replacement, Knee, Anesthesia Conduction

In brief

Continuous adductor canal block (CACB) is becoming increasingly popular for providing postoperative analgesia following knee arthroplasties. These continuous blocks are provided through inserted nerve catheters and effectively extend the duration of analgesia, thereby reducing opioid consumption. This, in turn, helps minimize opioid-related side effects, promotes early ambulation, and supports earlier discharge. However, catheter migration remains a significant concern, as the catheter tip can become displaced from the adductor canal due to movements associated with ambulation or physiotherapy. In this study, the investigators compare the migration rates of two different techniques for CACB catheters insertion: the Interfascial plane between SArtorious muscle and FEmoral artery (ISAFE) and the Out Of Plane parallel to Saphenous nerve (OOPS) techniques. Pain scores and opioid consumption on postoperative day 1 (POD1) will also be assessed as secondary outcomes. The hypothesis is that both techniques will result in similar migration rates of CACB catheter.

Key facts

Study ID
NCT07681622
Run by
University of Toronto
People needed
48
Starts
2026-06-01
Expected to finish
2027-06-01
Last updated by the study team
2026-07-02

Who can join

Age: 21 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.