Comparison of Focal Cryoablation vs. Radiofrequency Cardioneuroablation for Bradyarrhythmias

Recruiting now · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Bradycardia, Syncope, Vasovagal, Sick Sinus Syndrome, Atrioventricular Block

In brief

Bradyarrhythmias are conditions where the heart beats too slowly, causing symptoms like dizziness, fainting, and fatigue. In some patients, these slow heart rhythms are caused by overactivity of the vagus nerve (the part of the nervous system that slows the heart down). Cardioneuroablation (CNA) is a catheter-based procedure that targets and reduces the effect of these overactive nerves on the heart. It is an alternative to permanent pacemaker implantation, especially for younger patients. Traditionally, CNA is performed using radiofrequency (RF) energy to create small burns in specific areas of the heart. This study investigates whether focal cryoablation (freezing technology using the Freezor™ Xtra catheter) is as safe and effective as standard RF ablation for CNA. This is a prospective, non-randomized study. Participants will receive either RF ablation (N=30) or cryoablation (N=30). The study will evaluate the recurrence of slow heart rhythms and fainting episodes, as well as any complications, over 12 months of follow-up.

Key facts

Study ID
NCT07671898
Run by
Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
People needed
60
Starts
2024-09-01
Expected to finish
2028-12-25
Last updated by the study team
2026-06-26

Who can join

Age: 18 and older, up to 60. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.