Endoscopic vs Non-endoscopic Drainage for Benign Gallbladder Diseases in High-risk Patients or Patients Desiring Gallbladder Preservation

Starting soon

Conditions studied: Gallbladder Diseases, Cholecystitis, Acute, Cholelithiasis

In brief

Common gallbladder conditions like gallstones, polyps, and gallbladder inflammation are typically treated by surgically removing the gallbladder. However, surgery may be too risky for elderly patients or those with severe medical conditions, and some patients strongly prefer to keep their gallbladder. Newer, less-invasive endoscopic treatments can drain the gallbladder to treat inflammation without surgery. However, after successful drainage, doctors currently do not know whether it is better to leave a stent inside for long-term drainage or to actively remove the gallbladder stones using an endoscope. This multicenter study will follow patients in a real-world setting to compare these two approaches: the endoscopic treatment group (stone removal after drainage) and the non-endoscopic treatment group (long-term drainage alone). The goal is to evaluate which method is safer and more effective over the long term, helping doctors make better clinical decisions and improve patients' quality of life.

Key facts

Study ID
NCT07649811
Run by
Air Force Military Medical University, China
People needed
220
Starts
2026-07-01
Expected to finish
2027-12-31
Last updated by the study team
2026-06-16

Who can join

Age: 18 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.