Maxillary Canine Retraction Using Stainless Steel and Titanium-molybdenum Alloy Wires in TAD-supported Segmental Mechanics

Enrolling by invitation · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Malocclusion, Canine Retraction, Orthodontics, Tooth Movement Techniques, Anchorage Planning

In brief

The goal of this randomized clinical study is to compare the effectiveness of stainless steel (SS) and titanium-molybdenum alloy (TMA) wires for maxillary canine retraction using TAD-supported segmental mechanics. The main question it aims to answer is: Which wire material, stainless steel or titanium-molybdenum alloy, provides better outcomes in maxillary canine retraction when used with TAD-supported segmental mechanics? Researchers will compare SS reverse-closing loops with TMA reverse-closing loops to evaluate differences in the rate of canine retraction and canine angulation changes during orthodontic space closure. Participants will: * Receive mini-implants/TADs on both sides of the maxillary arch. * Receive a stainless steel reverse-closing loop on one side and a TMA reverse-closing loop on the contralateral side. * Receive the same standardized force of 150 g on both sides. * Visit the clinic every 4 weeks for a total duration of 4 months. * Undergo OPG radiographs before retraction and after the 4-month study period to assess canine angulation.

Key facts

Study ID
NCT07645417
Run by
Tanzila Rafique
People needed
16
Starts
2025-07-01
Expected to finish
2026-12-01
Last updated by the study team
2026-06-15

Who can join

Age: 1 and older, up to 3. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.