Effect of High Flow Nasal Therapy (HFNC) Weaning Protocols vs Standard of Care on Respiratory Outcomes in Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure
Recruiting now · Not applicable
Conditions studied: Acute Respiratory Failure (ARF)
In brief
High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is a widely used noninvasive respiratory support technique for patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF). It provides heated and humidified oxygen at high flow rates, improving oxygenation, reducing respiratory effort, and enhancing patient comfort. International guidelines recommend HFNC over conventional oxygen therapy in hypoxemic ARF. However, there is significant variability in clinical practice regarding HFNC discontinuation, and no standardized weaning criteria currently exist. Prolonged HFNC use may increase hospital stay and healthcare costs, while premature discontinuation may lead to respiratory deterioration and the need for further ventilatory support. Previous studies suggest that successful HFNC weaning may be predicted by a Fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO₂) ≤40% and a Respiratory rate-Oxygenation index (ROX index) ≥9.2. The ROX index is calculated as the ratio of peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO₂) divided by fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO₂) to respiratory rate. The primary objective of this study is to compare a standardized HFNC weaning strategy based on ROX index and FiO₂ thresholds with usual clinical practice based on physician judgment. The primary outcome is weaning failure at the first attempt, defined as the need for HFNC reinstitution, noninvasive or invasive mechanical ventilation, or death within 48 hours after discontinuation.
Key facts
- Study ID
- NCT07638293
- Run by
- University of Milan
- People needed
- 148
- Starts
- 2026-05-15
- Expected to finish
- 2028-05-01
- Last updated by the study team
- 2026-06-10
Who can join
Age: 18 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.
You may qualify if…
- Age ≥18 years
- Presence of acute respiratory failure (ARF)
- Receiving HFNC treatment for ≥24 hours
You may not qualify if…
- Post-extubation HFNC use or tracheostomized patients
- Respiratory acidosis (pH <7.35) or clinically significant acute hypercapnia (pCO₂ >50 mmHg with worsening from baseline)
- Long-term home NIV or home CPAP use
- Do-not-intubate (DNI) orders precluding escalation to invasive mechanical ventilation
- Life expectancy ≤48-72 hours due to terminal non-respiratory disease
- Neurological impairment or deep sedation preventing safe HFNC use (e.g. coma or severe uncontrolled delirium)
- Technical contraindications to HFNC (i.e. facial trauma, maxillofacial surgery, severe nasal obstruction)
- Refusal to participate or inability to provide informed consent
Where it is running
- Pulmonology Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo. Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Milan (Italy) — Milan, Lombardy, Italy (enrolling)
- Pulmonology Unit, University Hospital "G. Rodolico-San Marco" — Catania, Sicily, Italy
Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.