Comparing the Effectiveness of Tensioner Vs Slider Neurodynamic Techniques in Patients With Sciatica

Recruiting now · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Sciatica, Sciatica Pain

In brief

objective of this randomized controlled trial is to examine the efficacy of both tensioner and slider neurodynamic approaches in patients suffering from sciatica. This study seeks to establish which approach is more efficacious in alleviating pain intensity, disability functional, and mobility. The results of this study will assist physical therapists in making an informed decision on the type of neurodynamic therapy for their patients.

Key facts

Study ID

NCT07632612

Run by

Ibadat International University, Islamabad

People needed

80

Starts

2026-06-03

Expected to finish

2026-09-10

Last updated by the study team

2026-06-08

Who can join

Age: 20 and older, up to 50. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

• Patients with radicular pain persisting for 12 weeks to 1 year, with no acute episode in the last 4 weeks
• Unilateral symptoms radiating below the buttock to thigh, knee, or lower leg
• Positive Slump Test
• Positive Straight Leg Raise (SLR) test above 45°
• Functional limitation during activities such as walking or lifting

You may not qualify if…

• BMI < 20 kg/m² or > 30 kg/m²
• Previous history of spinal surgery
• Presence of red flags (significant motor/sensory loss, altered reflexes, or bowel/bladder dysfunction)
• Peripheral neuropathy
• History of vertebral fracture or significant spinal/limb trauma
• Systemic diseases (e.g., diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular, or renal disease)
• Progressive neurological deficits (motor weakness, sensory loss, reflex changes)
• Pregnancy

Where it is running

• Ibadat International Hospital — Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, Pakistan (enrolling)

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.