COMPARISON OF AIRWAY NERVE BLOCK VERSUS NEBULIZED LIDOCAINE ON HEMODYNAMIC RESPONSES DURING AWAKE FIBEROPTIC INTUBATION

Starting soon · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Blood Pressure After Nerve Block, Hemodynamic Stability During Awake Intubation

In brief

This prospective randomized controlled trial aims to compare the effectiveness of airway nerve blocks versus nebulized lidocaine in attenuating hemodynamic responses during awake fiberoptic intubation in adult patients with anticipated difficult airways. Eighty patients undergoing elective surgery requiring awake fiberoptic intubation will be randomly assigned to receive either airway nerve blocks (glossopharyngeal and transtracheal blocks with lidocaine) or nebulized lidocaine. The primary outcome will be changes in heart rate and mean arterial pressure during and after intubation. Secondary outcomes include intubation conditions, patient comfort, cough severity, intubation time, and procedure-related complications. The study aims to identify the most effective airway anesthesia technique for maintaining hemodynamic stability and improving patient tolerance during awake fiberoptic intubation.

Key facts

Study ID
NCT07627100
Run by
Mayo Hospital Lahore
People needed
80
Starts
2026-06-28
Expected to finish
2027-08-01
Last updated by the study team
2026-06-04

Who can join

Age: 18 and older, up to 65. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.