Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Genomics & Science DOJO 3.0 Learning Method in Improving Research Skills and Scientific Writing Among Researchers in Indonesia

Recruiting now · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Workshop, Critical Thinking Skill, Data Analysis Skill, Personal Empowerment, Manuscript Quality, Genomics, Science, Research Publication, Learning Methodology, Quality of Teaching

In brief

The goal of this study is to rigorously evaluate the effectiveness of the DOJO 3.0 learning methodology in enhancing research skills and scientific writing among researchers in Indonesia compared to non-DOJO learning method. The main questions it aims to answer are: How effective is the Dojo 3.0 methodology in improving participants' research skills and scientific writing, including critical thinking, data analysis ability, knowledge acquisition, and scientific manuscript quality and publication progress? How do participants' experiences, perceptions of the learning process and teaching quality, as well as their engagement, performance, and learning behaviors, differ between the intervention (DOJO) and control groups throughout the program? Researchers will compare two groups, control group and intervention group to see if there is a significant difference between these two groups. Standard learning method Non-DOJO (Control) DOJO learning method (Intervention) For the intervention group, participants will participate in Shinjitsu class, an interactive dynamic lecture with real time engagement, an offline minicamp session with lecture that is more intense, intentionally more provocative and dynamic, wounded healer, shinjitsu ninja obstacles, shinjitsu ninja run, sparring and Tournament.

Key facts

Study ID

NCT07607301

Run by

Summit Institute for Development, Indonesia

People needed

96

Starts

2026-06-04

Expected to finish

2027-03-01

Last updated by the study team

2026-06-15

Who can join

Age: any. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: accepted.

You may qualify if…

• Registered participants of Genomics \& Science DOJO 3.0
• Teams consisting of two members
• Submission of research concept note
• Completion of screening and assessment stages (administratively and substantially through blind concept note screening and team's curriculum vitae)
• Willingness and commitment to participate in the full program will be ensured through a structured confirmation process.
• In addition, participants will be required to review, sign, and submit a commitment letter outlining the full schedule, expectations for attendance, and participation requirements.
• Information regarding program schedule and participation expectations will be communicated at multiple stages, including during registration, program launch, and post-selection, to ensure participants are fully informed prior to confirming their participation.
• Involvement/ attendance of the first author

You may not qualify if…

• Incomplete registration or documentation
• Failure to meet team composition requirements
• Withdrawal before intervention
• Incomplete baseline data

Where it is running

• Summit Institute for Development — Jakarta, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia (enrolling)

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.