Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus Versus Continuous Epidural Infusion for Postoperative Analgesia After Total Knee Arthroplasty

Starting soon · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Total Knee Anthroplasty, Epidural Analgesia

In brief

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two different epidural analgesia delivery methods for pain control after total knee arthroplasty in adults undergoing elective surgery. The study will evaluate whether programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) provides better postoperative analgesia and recovery outcomes than continuous epidural infusion (CEI). The main questions it aims to answer are: Does PIEB reduce total epidural local anesthetic consumption during the first 24 postoperative hours compared with CEI? Does PIEB improve postoperative pain control and quality of recovery? Are there differences between the two methods regarding motor block, rescue analgesic requirement, patient-controlled epidural analgesia use, and adverse effects? Researchers will compare PIEB plus patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with CEI plus PCEA in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Participants will: Receive combined spinal-epidural anesthesia during surgery Receive postoperative epidural analgesia using either PIEB or CEI Be evaluated for pain scores, motor block, recovery quality, epidural local anesthetic consumption, rescue analgesic requirement, and adverse events during the first 24 postoperative hours

Key facts

Study ID
NCT07605208
Run by
Sakarya University
People needed
90
Starts
2026-06-01
Expected to finish
2027-12-01
Last updated by the study team
2026-05-28

Who can join

Age: 18 and older, up to 80. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.