Effect of Immediate Placement and Loading of Compressive Versus Conventional Implants

Recruiting now · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Other Endosseous Dental Implant Failure

In brief

The current study aims to compare immediate placement and loading of compressive versus conventional dental implants after atraumatic extraction regarding the effectiveness, bone resorption and survival of each of them.

Key facts

Study ID

NCT07601347

Run by

Ahmed Nagi Alghandour

People needed

30

Starts

2025-12-01

Expected to finish

2026-12-01

Last updated by the study team

2026-05-22

Who can join

Age: 20 and older, up to 40. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: accepted.

You may qualify if…

• Medically free patient
• Males and females
• Non-smoker patients
• Age ranging from 20-40 years
• Badly destructed upper premolar teeth that require implants, bone covering 2/3 of the root and of sufficient bone volume.

You may not qualify if…

• Patients with systemic conditions known to affect the periodontal status and healing such as uncontrolled diabetes and osteoporosis
• Heavy smokers
• Unfavorable position of the tooth or remaining roots
• Vitamin D deficiency,
• Periapical lesion/ periodontal affection

Where it is running

• Beni-suef university — Banī Suwayf, Egypt (enrolling)

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.