Comparison of Radiological Outcome of Conventional vs Accelerated Ponseti Casting Technique for Treatment of Club Foot

Recruiting now · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Club Foot

In brief

Club foot (congenital talipes equinovarus) is a common birth deformity affecting 1-2 per 1,000 live births, with even higher rates in low-income countries. The standard treatment is the Ponseti method using weekly serial casts, but weekly visits for several weeks can be challenging for families in hot climates or with limited resources. This randomized controlled trial compares the standard once-weekly Ponseti casting with an accelerated twice-weekly casting technique. The primary outcome is radiological correction measured by the lateral talocalcaneal angle (target ≥35°) on standardized foot X-rays taken six weeks after brace fitting. Secondary outcomes include the talocalcaneal index (\>40) and the tibio-calcaneal (dorsiflexion) angle (60-90°). Babies under six months of age with idiopathic club foot will be randomly assigned to either the standard or accelerated casting group. All other aspects of the Ponseti method (manipulation, number of casts, tenotomy when needed, final cast for three weeks, and foot abduction orthosis) remain identical. Adverse events such as skin problems, swelling, or cast complications will be recorded. The study aims to determine whether accelerated casting achieves better radiographic correction without increasing risks.

Key facts

Study ID
NCT07554092
Run by
Khyber Medical University Peshawar
People needed
144
Starts
2026-02-01
Expected to finish
2026-11-25
Last updated by the study team
2026-04-28

Who can join

Age: 0 and older, up to 0. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.