Kinematic vs Mechanical Alignment in High Tibial Osteotomy

Starting soon · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Osteo Arthritis of the Knee, Genu Varum

In brief

To compare between kinematic and mechanichal alignment after High Tibial Osteotomy (clinically and radiologically)

Key facts

Study ID

NCT07551089

Run by

Assiut University

People needed

100

Starts

2026-06-01

Expected to finish

2029-10-01

Last updated by the study team

2026-05-26

Who can join

Age: any. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

• Clinical: 1. Age : Adult with symptomatic osteoarthritic varus knee 2-Medial knee pain with functional limitation ≥6 months despite optimized non-operative care.
• Radiological: 1- Medial compartment OA in Xray AP-Lateral view 2-Degree of varus ≥3 and ≤15 degree in long film(full-length, standing hip-to-ankle radiographs) 3-•Varus knee (mpta ≤85 degree and ldfa ≤93 and jlca ≤5)
• Physical : 1-Range of motion: Flexion ≥110°, flexion contracture ≤10°, extension lag ≤5°.
• 2-Gait testing: Able to walk unaided (or with standard aid) for instrumented gait analysis.

You may not qualify if…

• 1- Predominantly lateral compartment OA 2- severe patellofemoral arthritis 3- Prior high tibial osteotomy, knee arthroplasty, or complex fracture around the knee 4-Inflammatory arthropathies (eg, rheumatoid arthritis) 5- end stage medial compartment osteoarthritis with bone erosions 6-chondrocalcinosis

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.