Comparison of the Outcomes of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Versus Total Abdominal Hysterectomy for Benign Gynecologic Conditions in a Limited-resources Setting.
Starting soon
Conditions studied: Benign Gynecologic Conditions
In brief
Minimally invasive hysterectomy (laparoscopic) is associated with shorter hospital stay, less blood loss, faster recovery, and improved early postoperative quality of life compared with open abdominal hysterectomy. However, in low-resource settings, barriers such as equipment availability, cost, and limited surgeon experience may influence outcomes.
Key facts
- Study ID
- NCT07496814
- Run by
- Assiut University
- People needed
- 32
- Starts
- 2026-04-01
- Expected to finish
- 2027-12-01
- Last updated by the study team
- 2026-03-27
Who can join
Age: 35 and older, up to 65. Sex: female. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.
You may qualify if…
- Women aged 35-65 years.
- Indication for elective hysterectomy for benign disease.
- Uterine size ≤ 16 weeks.
You may not qualify if…
- Malignancy or suspicion of malignancy.
- Prior extensive abdominal surgery with dense adhesions.
- Morbid obesity, BMI more than 40
- Severe cardiopulmonary disease.
- Pregnancy.
- Refusal participates in study
Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.