Single-Window Versus Two-Window Posterolateral Approach for Malleolar Fractures

Recruiting now · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Ankle Fractures, Posterior Malleolus Fractures, Lateral Malleolus Fracture

In brief

The purpose of this prospective clinical trial is to compare the clinical outcomes and early wound complication rates of two different surgical techniques used during the posterolateral approach for ankle fractures. Participants with fractures involving the posterior and lateral malleoli will undergo surgery using either a single-window technique (using a posterior antiglide plate) or a two-window technique (using a lateral anatomic plate). The main question the study aims to answer is whether the single-window approach reduces soft-tissue complications by minimizing surgical dissection, without compromising fracture stability. Patients will be followed for 12 months to assess wound healing, ankle range of motion, implant irritation, and functional recovery.

Key facts

Study ID
NCT07481266
Run by
muhammed kılıç
People needed
100
Starts
2024-02-14
Expected to finish
2027-03-01
Last updated by the study team
2026-03-20

Who can join

Age: 18 and older, up to 65. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.