Road Mapping Guided Puncture Versus Ultrasound Guided Puncture During Retrograde Angioplasty Feasibility and Safety

Recruiting now · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Peripheral Arterial Disease, Vascular Diseases

In brief

The study aims to compare the technical feasibility and safety of road mapping-guided versus ultrasound-guided retrograde arterial puncture in patients with (CLTI) as measured by: * Puncture success rate * Access-related complication rate (e.g., hematoma, vessel dissection, perforation)

Key facts

Study ID

NCT07427108

Run by

Sohag University

People needed

32

Starts

2026-02-01

Expected to finish

2027-03-01

Last updated by the study team

2026-02-23

Who can join

Age: 18 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may not qualify if…

• Active infection at the puncture site: Any localized infection, particularly over the ankle region , will be an exclusion.
• Severe calcification or anatomical abnormalities: Patients with excessive arterial calcification or significant anatomical distortion preventing safe retrograde puncture.

Where it is running

• Sohag University Hospital — Sohag, Egypt (enrolling)

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.