PCI With GDMT Versus GDMT Alone for Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy and Reduced LVEF

Starting soon · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction, Coronary Artery Disease, Stable GDMT

In brief

To evaluate whether percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with contemporary drug-eluting stents (DES) combined with guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT), compared to GDMT alone, reduces the time to first occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) during a median follow-up of at least 24 months, measured at the time the last enrolled patient reaches 12 months, in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40%. MACE is a composite of cardiovascular \[CV\] death, myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure (HF) related rehospitalization, heart transplantation, requirement for durable left ventricular assist device \[LVAD\] implantation, or worsening heart failure treated as an out-patient requiring treatment with intravenous medications.

Key facts

Study ID
NCT07349979
Run by
Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University
People needed
1154
Starts
2026-12-30
Expected to finish
2028-01-30
Last updated by the study team
2026-05-28

Who can join

Age: 18 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.