Pulmonary Volume Changes During Synchonized Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation

Recruiting now

Conditions studied: Infant, Preterm, Respiratory Distress Syndrome (Neonatal), Chronic Lung Disease of Newborn, Respiratory Support, Synchronized Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation (SNIPPV), Lung Volume

In brief

Current evidence suggests that noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) is more effective than continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in preventing respiratory failure in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), both as initial and post-extubation support. NIPPV may be delivered in synchronized (sNIPPV) or non-synchronized (nsNIPPV) modes, with sNIPPV offering clear benefits by coordinating support with the infant's own breathing. Recent studies indicate sNIPPV is superior to nsNIPPV in preventing respiratory failure, though the intrapulmonary mechanisms behind this advantage remain unclear. To address this, the present study uses Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) to evaluate how lung volume changes during different types of breaths and ventilator inflations - spontaneous breaths, synchronized inflations, non-synchronized inflations, and backup inflations - in preterm infants receiving sNIPPV.

Key facts

Study ID
NCT07237139
Run by
University of Zurich
People needed
27
Starts
2025-11-17
Expected to finish
2027-01-30
Last updated by the study team
2025-12-09

Who can join

Age: any, up to 0. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.