Acute Effects of High-intensity Interval Aerobic and Functional Training at Different Intensities

Recruiting now · Not applicable

Conditions studied: High Intensity Interval Training (Cycling), High Intensity Interval Training (Running), High Intensity Functional Training, Moderate Intensity Functional Training, High Intensity Traditional Strength Training, Moderate Intensity Traditional Strength Training

In brief

Moderate-intensity physical exercise is widely recognized for its health benefits, yet time constraints limit adherence. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) has gained popularity as a more time-efficient alternative, eliciting significant cardiovascular, respiratory, metabolic, and neuromuscular responses. More recently, functional strength exercises have been integrated into high-intensity training, leading to high-intensity functional training (HIFT) and moderate-intensity functional training (MIFT). However, the acute physiological responses to these modalities remain underexplored compared to traditional HIIT (running or cycling) and strength training. This study aims to assess and compare the acute cardiovascular, metabolic, and neuromuscular responses of HIFT, MIFT, HIIT, and traditional strength training in healthy, physically active adults to inform their potential application in special populations.

Key facts

Study ID
NCT07180550
Run by
European University Miguel de Cervantes
People needed
27
Starts
2025-10-12
Expected to finish
2027-01-31
Last updated by the study team
2026-03-10

Who can join

Age: 18 and older, up to 100. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.