Refractive Accuracy of Toric Intraocular Lens Implantation Using Digital Marking Compared to Conventional Marking
Completed
Conditions studied: Cataract, Astigmatism
In brief
To evaluate the postoperative refractive accuracy and intraoperative lens rotational placement of a conventional toric intraoperative marking method compared to digital marking.
Key facts
- Study ID
- NCT07176897
- Run by
- Colvard Kandavel Eye Center
- People needed
- 41
- Starts
- 2024-06-01
- Expected to finish
- 2025-03-12
- Last updated by the study team
- 2025-09-16
Who can join
Age: 50 and older, up to 90. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.
You may qualify if…
- Adults (50-90 years of age) that were candidates for uncomplicated cataract surgery and planned to be implanted with toric IOLs (CCWOTx, Alcon Vision, LLC)
You may not qualify if…
- History of amblyopia
- History of macular disease
- History of glaucoma
- History of corneal disease
- History of prior corneal surgery
- History of diabetes
- History of ocular comorbidity that might hamper post operative visual acuity
- History of previous ocular or refractive surgery with expected post-op VA worse than 0.10 logMAR
- History of irregular corneal astigmatism and keratoconus, or severe/uncontrolled ocular surface disease or dry eye disease.
Where it is running
- Colvard-Kandavel Eye Center — Encino, California, United States
- Freedom Vision Surgery Center — Encino, California, United States
Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.