Comparison of V-NOTES and Laparoscopic Mesh-Free Sacrocolpopexy Techniques

Recruiting now · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Pelvic Organ Prolapse

In brief

This study aims to compare the surgical outcomes, safety profiles, and patient satisfaction between two minimally invasive techniques for pelvic organ prolapse repair: Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (V-NOTES) mesh-free sacrocolpopexy and laparoscopic mesh-free sacrocolpopexy. By evaluating perioperative data, complication rates, anatomical and functional outcomes, this trial seeks to determine whether the V-NOTES approach provides comparable or superior results to the traditional laparoscopic technique, without the use of synthetic mesh.

Key facts

Study ID

NCT07082023

Run by

Havva Betül Bacak

People needed

52

Starts

2025-07-01

Expected to finish

2026-01-01

Last updated by the study team

2025-07-24

Who can join

Age: 18 and older, up to 75. Sex: female. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

• Patients who applied to Gaziosmanpaşa Education and Research Hospital, Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinic, who underwent surgery due to symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse with apical and anterior POP Q stage 2 and above, Being over 18 years old Patients who underwent surgery by experienced surgeons

You may not qualify if…

• Having previously received KT and/or RT due to any malignancy Having previously undergone surgery due to proplasus Patients with severe cardiovascular or respiratory disease

Where it is running

• Gaziosmanpasa Training and Research Hospital — Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye) (enrolling)

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.