Total Arterial vs. Mixed Grafting in Left Coronary CABG

Starting soon · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting, Arterial Graft, Graft Patency, Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events

In brief

This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled trial comparing the clinical efficacy of total arterial grafting (internal thoracic artery and radial artery) versus conventional mixed grafting (internal thoracic artery and great saphenous vein) in the left coronary artery system during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). A total of 400 patients undergoing elective CABG at the Second Hospital of Jilin University will be enrolled and randomized into two groups. The primary endpoint is graft patency at 12 months postoperatively, evaluated by coronary angiography or CT angiography. Secondary outcomes include perioperative complications, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and long-term clinical prognosis. The study aims to provide evidence-based guidance on optimal graft selection in CABG.

Key facts

Study ID
NCT07057713
Run by
Second Hospital of Jilin University
People needed
400
Starts
2026-08-01
Expected to finish
2027-12-30
Last updated by the study team
2026-04-23

Who can join

Age: 18 and older, up to 80. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.