Comparing Surfactant Administration Through Supraglottic Airway and Thin Catheter for Preterm Infants

Recruiting now · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Surfactant, Respiratory Distress Syndrome (Neonatal)

In brief

What is this study about? This study is comparing two ways of giving surfactant, a medicine that helps premature infants breathe better. Surfactant can be given using a thin tube ("Less Invasive Surfactant Administration", called the LISA method) or through a small airway device placed in the baby's throat ("Surfactant Administration through Laryngeal or Supraglottic Airway", called the SALSA method). The goal is to see which method is safer and more effective for infants who are born at or after 29 weeks of pregnancy and have trouble breathing. What is the main question (hypothesis)? Infants who receive surfactant using the SALSA method will have fewer breathing-related problems and fewer short-term complications than those who receive it using the LISA method. What are the aims? Aim 1: Are babies in the SALSA group less likely to have low heart rate or low oxygen levels during the procedure compared to babies in the LISA group? Aim 2: Do fewer babies in the SALSA group need to be put on a breathing machine within the first 72 hours of life? Aim 3: Does the SALSA method help reduce the overall time babies need breathing support and lower the cost of their care in the NICU?

Key facts

Study ID
NCT07030270
Run by
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
People needed
40
Starts
2026-08-05
Expected to finish
2030-08-01
Last updated by the study team
2026-08-10

Who can join

Age: any, up to 0. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.