Prospective Randomized Observer Blinded Single Center Study Comparing 90-day Functional Outcome in Patients Who Received Intravenous Propofol Infusion Versus Inhalational Sevoflurane for General Anesthesia During Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients Who Suffered From Acute Ischemic Stroke

Recruiting now · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients

In brief

This study is being done to compare outcomes after surgery for individuals who receive anesthesia through by inhaling medication and individuals who receive anesthesia intravenously by needle when experiencing treatment for their stroke. Currently very little is known about the outcomes for patients when comparing these two techniques of providing anesthesia during surgery. This study will provide information regarding outcomes that will help health care providers decide which technique will be better for patients

Key facts

Study ID

NCT07001267

Run by

University of Kansas Medical Center

People needed

120

Starts

2025-06-04

Expected to finish

2027-12-31

Last updated by the study team

2026-03-12

Who can join

Age: 18 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

• >18 years Acute ischemic stroke requiring endovascular treatment.

You may not qualify if…

• <18 years
• Pregnant patients
• Patients with malignant hyperthermia
• Allergies or any contraindications to either inhalational or intravenous agents
• Patients already on intravenous anesthetic infusions
• Prisoners
• Students and employees

Where it is running

• University of Kansas Medical Center — Kansas City, Kansas, United States (enrolling)

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.