Comparison of the Systematic Versus the Selective Use of Heparin for the Prevention of Radial Artery Occlusion

Recruiting now · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Radial Artery Occlusion

In brief

Randomized study comparing the systematic use of heparin (standard of care) against an elective use of heparin to prevent radial artery occlusion after a percutaneous catheterization using a dual-artery compression system.

Key facts

Study ID

NCT06981624

Run by

Olivier F. Bertrand

People needed

500

Starts

2025-05-13

Expected to finish

2026-12-01

Last updated by the study team

2026-01-26

Who can join

Age: 18 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

• Any patient referred for a diagnostic transradial catheterism

You may not qualify if…

• Unable to understand study design or provide informed consent
• Unable to receive antiplatelet therapy with aspirina and/or clopidogrel-prasugrel and/or ticagrelor and intravenous anticoagulant derived from heparine or bivalirudine
• Local condition such as hematoma or pseudo-aneurims precluding radial or ulnar access.
• Presence of plethysmographic waveform with simultaneous radial and ulnar occlusive compression (due to colaterals or interouseous artery) precluding the evaluation of patent hemostasis.

Where it is running

• IUCPQ — Québec, Quebec, Canada (enrolling)

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.