Sugammadex-Induced Clenching During Neuromuscular Blockade Reversal

Recruiting now · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Neuromuscular Blockade Reversal Agent, Perioperative Complications, Anesthesia, General, Sugammadex, Monitoring, Intraoperative, Masseter Muscle Spasm

In brief

Study Objective: This study aims to evaluate the incidence, severity, and risk factors of sugammadex-induced mouth clenching during neuromuscular blockade (NMB) reversal in adult surgical patients. Study Design: This prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial enrolls adult patients (ASA physical status I-II, aged 19-70 years) undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia with rocuronium. Patients will be randomized into four groups to receive either sugammadex at doses of 1 mg/kg, 2 mg/kg, or 4 mg/kg, or a combination of pyridostigmine and glycopyrrolate. Primary Outcome: The primary outcome is the incidence of clenching within 10 minutes after NMB reversal, assessed by clinical observation, masseter EMG, and airway pressure changes, using a novel five-grade severity scale. Secondary Outcomes: Secondary outcomes include the severity of clenching, time to TOF ratio ≥0.9, BIS values at clenching onset, complications, and identification of risk factors such as dose, sex, BIS, age, BMI, and rocuronium dose. Significance: This study seeks to improve perioperative safety by identifying modifiable risk factors and informing dose adjustments or alternative reversal strategies to prevent sugammadex-induced clenching, particularly in high-risk populations.

Key facts

Study ID
NCT06962007
Run by
Wonkwang University Hospital
People needed
240
Starts
2025-07-01
Expected to finish
2026-10-14
Last updated by the study team
2026-07-07

Who can join

Age: 19 and older, up to 70. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.