Uterine Round Ligament Preservation Vs Resection in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair in Women:A Multicenter,Stratified Randomized Controlled Trial
Recruiting now · Not applicable
Conditions studied: Inguinal Hernia, Laparoscopic Surgery, Randomized Controlled Trial
In brief
This study aims to compare the clinical effects of uterine round ligament preservation versus resection in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in women.The primary outcomes included Time required for patient surgery.The secondary outcomes included Inguinal hernia recurrence,quality of life assessment,Indicators of postoperative recovery,, et al.
Key facts
- Study ID
- NCT06885788
- Run by
- Nanchong Central Hospital
- People needed
- 466
- Starts
- 2024-09-20
- Expected to finish
- 2027-03-01
- Last updated by the study team
- 2025-03-25
Who can join
Age: 18 and older. Sex: female. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.
You may qualify if…
- ►Age : Female patients over 18 years of age without a childbearing requirement
- Diagnosis and basis : Female patients diagnosed with Unilateral inguinal hernia.
- agreed to participate in this study and signed the informed consent form.
You may not qualify if…
- ►Combined with severe heart, liver, kidney and other diseases.
- pregnant or lactating women.
- those with surgical contraindications.
Where it is running
- Nanchong Central Hospital — Nanchong, Sichuan, China (enrolling)
Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.