"Patient Satisfaction with Intra-Oral Vs. Extra-Oral Scanned 3D-Printed Dentures: an in Vivo Study"
Recruiting now · Not applicable
Conditions studied: Complete Edentulism
In brief
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate patient satisfaction with intra-orally scanned versus extra-orally scanned digitally printed maxillary dentures in completely edentulous patients. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Do intra-orally scanned dentures provide higher patient satisfaction compared to extra-orally scanned dentures? 2. Are there significant differences in comfort, fit, aesthetics and phonetics between the two types of dentures? Researchers will compare the intra-orally scanned denture group to the extra-orally scanned denture group to determine if one method leads to superior patient-reported outcomes. Participants will: * Receive both types of dentures (intra-orally scanned and extra-orally scanned), with a three-week wash-out period between each intervention. * Complete satisfaction surveys to assess comfort, fit, and aesthetics after using each type of denture. The study aims to provide evidence on the optimal scanning method for digitally printed maxillary dentures in edentulous patients.
Key facts
- Study ID
- NCT06846619
- Run by
- Cairo University
- People needed
- 8
- Starts
- 2023-12-03
- Expected to finish
- 2025-09-01
- Last updated by the study team
- 2025-02-26
Who can join
Age: any. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.
You may qualify if…
- Completely edentulous patients
- Angle's Class I skeletal relationship
- Normal facial symmetry
- Cooperative patients
You may not qualify if…
- -Temporomandibular disorders
- Uncontrolled diabetes
- Patient's with neuromuscular disorders
- Severe psychiatric disorders
- Angle's class II and III skeletal relationship.
Where it is running
- Faculty of dentistry-Cairo university — Cairo, Egypt (enrolling)
Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.