Patient Reported Experiences With Sparing External Oblique Fascia Vs Standard Inguinal Orchiectomy

Recruiting now · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Testicular Cancer

In brief

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the difference in patient-reported postoperative outcomes between two standard-of-care surgical techniques for radical orchiectomy (inguinal orchiectomy versus external oblique fascia sparing orchiectomy) for treatment of patients with suspected testicular malignancy. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Does sparing the external oblique fascia during orchiectomy reduce pain after surgery? 2. Is there a difference in narcotic consumption after surgery? 3. Is there a difference in neuropathic pain after surgery? 4. Is there a difference in complications after surgery?

Key facts

Study ID
NCT06828185
Run by
Loma Linda University
People needed
80
Starts
2026-12-01
Expected to finish
2029-09-01
Last updated by the study team
2026-07-10

Who can join

Age: 18 and older. Sex: male. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.