Warm Versus Conventional 2% Lignocaine for IANB Efficacy

Recruiting now · Phase 2

Conditions studied: Success of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block, Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block

In brief

The study compares the anesthetic efficacy of warm versus conventional 2% lignocaine for inferior alveolar nerve block in mandibular molars, evaluating success rates and onset time.

Key facts

Study ID

NCT06806202

Run by

Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry, Pakistan

People needed

200

Starts

2024-12-15

Expected to finish

2025-03-15

Last updated by the study team

2025-02-03

Who can join

Age: 18 and older, up to 50. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: accepted.

You may qualify if…

• Permanent teeth with acutely inflamed pulp without swelling or draining sinus.
• Patient who have carious mandibular molars.
• Patients of either gender aged between 18-50 years old.
• Systemically healthy patients.
• Patients who agree to attend for recall appointments and provide a written consent

You may not qualify if…

• Patients on preoperative analgesics and antibiotics.
• Teeth with calcified canals and previously treated teeth.
• Pregnant and lactating mothers.
• Patients who are immunocompromised, anxious and mentally handicapped.
• Patients who are allergic to lignocaine.
• Non-vital or necrosed teeth.

Where it is running

• Armed Forces Institute Of Dentistry — Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, Pakistan (enrolling)

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.