Uncuffed Endotracheal Tube vs. no Endotracheal Tube

Stopped early · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Multiple Pulmonary Diseases

In brief

This is a comparison of uncuffed endotracheal tube (UCETT) vs. no endotracheal tube (ETT) in endobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) procedure under moderate sedation in terms of procedure tolerance, duration of the procedure, desaturation, amount of sedation medication usage.

Key facts

Study ID

NCT06799455

Run by

University of Minnesota

People needed

4

Starts

2025-06-02

Expected to finish

2026-06-10

Last updated by the study team

2026-06-18

Who can join

Age: 18 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

• Any patient that is scheduled for EBUS-TBNA procedure

You may not qualify if…

• Those who are not safe to receive moderate sedation or flexible bronchoscopy

Where it is running

• University of Minnesota — Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.