Effects of Face Mask Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Vs. Noninvasive Ventilation Vs. High-flow Nasal Oxygen on Intubation-free Survival in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: the TRIPOD Randomized Clinical Trial

Recruiting now · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure, High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Therapy, Noninvasive Ventilation, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP)

In brief

Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) is a common indication for admission to an intensive care unit (ICU), with mortality exceeding 50% in cases where invasive mechanical ventilation is needed. Therefore, assessment of the most adequate oxygen strategy to avoid intubation in patients with AHRF deserves consideration.Previous studies have indicated that non-invasive oxygenation strategies, including high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO), helmet or face mask noninvasive ventilation (NIV), and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), are effective in preventing endotracheal intubation in adult patients with AHRF when compared to the standard oxygen therapy. However, the optimal non-invasive oxygenation strategies remain uncertain. This study aim to determine whether CPAP, compared with HFNC or NIV, increase the intubation-free survival during study period in patients with AHRF.

Key facts

Study ID
NCT06795971
Run by
Southeast University, China
People needed
1300
Starts
2025-01-23
Expected to finish
2027-12-31
Last updated by the study team
2025-02-26

Who can join

Age: 18 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.