TMJ Arthroscopy Compared to Arthrocentesis in Disc Displacement Without Reduction

Recruiting now · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Temporomandibular Joint Disc Displacement, Temporomandibular Joint Disc Displacement, Without Reduction, Temporomandibular Disorders (TMD)

In brief

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the intervention arthroscopic lysis and lavage to the intervention arthrocentesis in treating disabling and painful temporomandibular joint disc displacement without reduction. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Which surgical method that best improves mouth opening capacity, TMJ pain, and TMJ disability? * If any pre- or peri-operative variable/-s could be identified as a predictor for surgical outcome? Researchers will compare arthroscopic lysis and lavage to arthrocentesis to see if arthroscopic lysis and lavage works better to treat temporomandibular joint disc displacement. Participants will: * Have one of the two interventions under general anesthesia, not knowing which intervention. * Visit an external clinic for regular checkups at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. * Answer three different quality of life surveys at the checkups.

Key facts

Study ID
NCT06782178
Run by
Karolinska Institutet
People needed
100
Starts
2025-04-01
Expected to finish
2030-02-01
Last updated by the study team
2026-08-06

Who can join

Age: 18 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.