Urgent Carotid Endarterectomy (CEA) Versus Delayed CEA in Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis (SPREAD-STACI II)

Recruiting now · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Stroke, Ischemic, Transient Ischemic Accident, Endarterectomy, Carotid, Stroke Prevention

In brief

In patients with internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis of 50% or greater (measured according to the criteria of the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET)) who have experienced a transient ischemic attack (TIA) or minor ipsilateral stroke, carotid endarterectomy (CEA) offers maximum benefit if performed within 15 days of the initial ischemic symptom. National and international guidelines recommend surgical treatment (CEA) within this timeframe; however, no studies have specifically evaluated the optimal timing for CEA after a TIA or minor stroke. It is well established that the risk of a major stroke is highest in the first few days following a transient ischemic attack or minor stroke and then decreases over the subsequent days and weeks. This raises the hypothesis that performing an urgent carotid endarterectomy (within 3 days) may provide greater benefit compared to a delayed procedure (between 4 and 15 days).

Key facts

Study ID
NCT06767657
Run by
Italian Society of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
People needed
456
Starts
2025-07-03
Expected to finish
2028-01-01
Last updated by the study team
2026-03-04

Who can join

Age: 45 and older, up to 90. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.