Randomized Clinical Study Comparing Two Guided Surgery Techniques for Free-end Implant Placement

Recruiting now · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Dental Implant, Bone Resorption

In brief

This is a randomized multicenter clinical study that compares two static guided surgery techniques in free-end partial edentulism. The aim is to compare the accuracy obtained between dento-osseous supported and dento-mucosal supported surgical splints to place dental implants in posterior osseous ridges.

Key facts

Study ID

NCT06764654

Run by

Aula Dental Avanzada

People needed

20

Starts

2025-01-01

Expected to finish

2026-03-01

Last updated by the study team

2025-07-09

Who can join

Age: 18 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: accepted.

You may qualify if…

• Patients who present to one of the two participating clinics with a posterior edentulous area starting from the second premolar.
• Patients in whom the placement of dental implants is not contraindicated.

You may not qualify if…

• Patients with hypersensitivities or allergies that contraindicate the intervention.
• Presence of orofacial neurological symptoms.
• Patients treated with bisphosphonates.
• Pregnant or breastfeeding women, or women undergoing contraceptive treatment.
• Signs of infection in the surgical area.
• Need for unconventional surgical procedures (e.g., split crest, vertical regeneration, block graft).
• Lack of patient cooperation.

Where it is running

• Clínica Dental Esteve — Alicante, Alicante, Spain (enrolling)
• Clínica Dental Sánchez Nicolás — Cabezo de Torres, Murcia, Spain (enrolling)

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.