C-MAC Blade D Video Vs Macintosh Laryngoscope for Double Lumen Tube Insertion
Recruiting now · Not applicable
Conditions studied: Video Laryngoscope, Double Lumen Tube Intubation, Elective Thoracic Surgery
In brief
The goal of this clinical trial is to know which type of laryngoscope is better for Double Lumen Tube (DLT) insertion, in participants undergoing elective thoracic surgeries. The main question aim to answer is Is C-MAC blade D video laryngoscope better than Macintosh laryngoscope for DLT insertion in term of time taking for intubation and hemodynamic changes to laryngoscopy? Researchers are comparing two groups of participants * Participants in Group A are receiving intubation from C-MAC blade D video laryngoscope. * Participants in Group B are receiving intubations from Macintosh laryngoscope.
Key facts
- Study ID
- NCT06759038
- Run by
- Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Institue of Trauma
- People needed
- 60
- Starts
- 2024-12-03
- Expected to finish
- 2025-03-01
- Last updated by the study team
- 2025-01-06
Who can join
Age: 18 and older, up to 60. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: accepted.
You may qualify if…
- Mallampati 1 and 2.
- ASA 1 and 2.
- Patients who will be prepared for elective thoracic surgeries under general anesthesia.
You may not qualify if…
- Pregnant Patients.
- Patients with anticipated difficult airway.
- Patients with limited neck extension.
- Thyromental distance less than 6.5cm.
- BMI greater than 35. (Weight in kilogram (kg) divided by height in meters squared)
- Patients at a risk of aspiration.
- Failure to intubate the patient after 3 attempts.
Where it is running
- Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Institute of Trauma — Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan (enrolling)
Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.