Levonorgestrel-piroxicam Versus Ulipristal Acetate for Emergency Contraception

Recruiting now · Phase 3 · Has a placebo group

Conditions studied: Contraception

In brief

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the failure rate of the levonorgestrel (LNG)-piroxicam combination regimen versus ulipristal acetate (UPA) as emergency contraception (EC). The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. whether the LNG-piroxicam combination regimen has a lower failure rate than UPA for EC; 2. whether the LNG-piroxicam combination regimen has a higher percentage of pregnancies prevented than UPA for EC 3. whether there is any difference in the change in the subsequent menstrual cycle and adverse effect profile between the two regimens Participants will: 1. Take a single dose of either (i) LNG 1.5 mg plus piroxicam 40 mg and a placebo tablet resembling UPA, or (ii) UPA 30 mg plus placebo tablets resembling LNG and piroxicam. 2. Have a blood test for serum LH, oestradiol an progesterone. 3. Keep a diary of their vaginal bleeding episodes, adverse effects symptoms, any further acts of intercourse and the type of contraception used. 4. Have a follow-up either in person by phone about 1-2 weeks after the next expected menstruation. 5. If normal menstrual bleeding has not occurred by that time, a pregnancy test will be carried out.

Key facts

Study ID
NCT06727734
Run by
The University of Hong Kong
People needed
980
Starts
2025-01-18
Expected to finish
2027-10-01
Last updated by the study team
2026-05-14

Who can join

Age: 18 and older, up to 45. Sex: female. Healthy volunteers: accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.