Comparison of Noninvasive vs. Invasive Hemodynamic Measurements

Running, not enrolling

Conditions studied: Heart Failure, Congestive

In brief

Comparison of a non-invasive method of measuring central venous pressure to the conventional modality of invasive central venous pressure.

Key facts

Study ID

NCT06689215

Run by

Nihon Kohden

People needed

30

Starts

2024-10-21

Expected to finish

2027-03-30

Last updated by the study team

2026-02-13

Who can join

Age: 18 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

• Adult age over 18 years.
• Arm circumference is 18 cm to 55 cm
• Subject will have an existing indwelling central venous catheter during their ICU stay
• Subject or legally authorized representative (LAR) is able to understand the risks and potential benefits of participating in the study and is willing to provide written informed consent
• Subject or LAR is willing and able to comply with protocol procedures

You may not qualify if…

• Finger and/or upper arm anatomical anomaly or disease that may interfere with attaching a pulse oximeter sensor and/or blood pressure cuff.
• Pregnant (self-reported)
• Upper extremity deep venous thrombosis currently being treated
• Severe skin disease involving the upper arm(s)
• Study investigator may exclude patients based on clinical judgement

Where it is running

• Stanford University Hospital — Stanford, California, United States

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.