Hyrax Vs. Invisalign Palatal Expander Clinical Study

Recruiting now · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Malocclusions, Narrow Maxilla, Narrow Maxillary Arch, Crowding

In brief

The purpose of this study is to compare expansion result and the overall experience between the Invisalign Palatal Expander and the Hyrax expander.

Key facts

Study ID

NCT06662279

Run by

Align Technology, Inc.

People needed

36

Starts

2024-10-25

Expected to finish

2026-01-01

Last updated by the study team

2024-12-04

Who can join

Age: 6 and older, up to 11. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

• Subject ages 6-11 years old
• Subject must need maxillary expansion
• Subjects must have erupted dentition in the area of the primary molars or permanent premolars and the first permanent molar

You may not qualify if…

• Subjects with palatal exostosis/surface aberration/ cleft palate
• Subject's dentition not compatible with device or allergy to device materials
• Subject with active caries, periodontal disease, TMD

Where it is running

• Orange Coast Orthodontics — Laguna Hills, California, United States (enrolling)
• Spillers Orthodontics — Warner Robins, Georgia, United States (enrolling)
• Innovative Orthodontic Centers — Naperville, Illinois, United States (enrolling)
• The Orthodontic Studio — Chevy Chase, Maryland, United States (enrolling)

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.