Buccal Infiltration of Different Volumes of Articaine for Extraction.

Recruiting now · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Buccal Infiltration, Articaine, Anesthesia

In brief

This study compares the effectiveness of two different volumes of buccal infiltration of Articaine for the extraction of mandibular posterior teeth. One group receives buccal infiltration of 1.8 ml of 4% Articaine and the other group receives buccal infiltration of 3.6 ml of 4% Articaine.

Key facts

Study ID

NCT06630819

Run by

Qassim University

People needed

114

Starts

2024-11-24

Expected to finish

2026-05-02

Last updated by the study team

2025-05-29

Who can join

Age: 18 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: accepted.

You may qualify if…

• All healthy patients (ASA I) or patients with mild systemic disease with no functional limitations (ASA II)
• Patients aged ≥ 18 years of age.
• Patients requiring extraction of mandibular posterior teeth including grossly decayed tooth, grade I mobile tooth, root stumps and indicated for therapeutic reasons.
• Patients not allergic to the drugs or anesthetic agents used in the surgery.

You may not qualify if…

• Acute infection at the extraction site.
• Patients indicated for surgical extraction of teeth.
• Patients already taking medications affecting pain assessment.
• Pregnant patients.

Where it is running

• College of Dentistry, Qassim University — Buraidah, Saudi Arabia (enrolling)
• Qassim University — Buraidah, Al Qassim, Saudi Arabia

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.