Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Implant Stability in Healed Maxillary Posterior Sites Comparing Osteotome, Osseodensification and Conventional Drilling Implant Placement Techniques

Recruiting now · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Implant Stability

In brief

This study aims to compare the implant stability values following implant placement via Osteotomes and via Osseodensification using Densah Burs versus implant placement using conventional drilling technique in patients with upper posterior partially edentulous ridges as well as evaluating the crestal bone loss around temporary restorations following the three compared drilling techniques.

Key facts

Study ID

NCT06599112

Run by

Cairo University

People needed

36

Starts

2024-09-01

Expected to finish

2025-12-01

Last updated by the study team

2024-09-19

Who can join

Age: 25 and older, up to 70. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: accepted.

You may qualify if…

• Patients with an age range of 25-70 years
• Patients with systemic health
• Patient with missing teeth in the upper posterior area
• Patients with D3 or D4 type of alveolar bone
• Healed bony sites with sufficient dimension for implant placement
• Vertical height (≥ 10 mm)
• Bucco-lingual dimension (≥ 5.5 mm)
• Mesio-distal width (≥6.5 mm)
• Patients with periodontal health (PD < 4mm, BOP < 10%)
• Inter-arch space of 7.5 to allow implant restoration
• Good oral hygiene
• Cooperative patients who accepted the trial follow up period and sign the informed consent

You may not qualify if…

• Pregnant females
• Smokers
• Patients with habits that may compromise the longevity and affect the result of the implant as alcoholism or parafunctional habits
• History of radiotherapy or use of bisphosphonates

Where it is running

• Cairo University — Giza, Egypt (enrolling)

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.