Comparison of Catheter Plus Marshall Vein Ablation vs. Catheter Ablation Alone in Persistent AF With Heart Failure

Recruiting now · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Atrial Fibrillation, Persistent, Heart Failure

In brief

This multicenter, randomized controlled trial aims to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of combining catheter ablation with Marshall vein ethanol ablation versus catheter ablation alone in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) and concomitant heart failure. Persistent AF is a common arrhythmia that significantly impacts the quality of life and survival rates, especially when coexisting with heart failure. While catheter ablation is a standard treatment for AF, its effectiveness in persistent AF, particularly in patients with heart failure, remains suboptimal. The addition of Marshall vein ethanol ablation may enhance treatment outcomes by targeting arrhythmogenic substrates. This study will enroll 120 participants across three centers to evaluate whether this combined approach can reduce AF recurrence, improve heart function, and enhance patient outcomes compared to catheter ablation alone.

Key facts

Study ID
NCT06578793
Run by
Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
People needed
120
Starts
2024-08-01
Expected to finish
2026-01-31
Last updated by the study team
2024-08-29

Who can join

Age: 18 and older, up to 80. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.