Sustained Inflation and Chest Compression vs 3:1 C:V Ratio in Asphyxiated Newborns

Starting soon · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Cardiac Arrest

In brief

Newborn infants who require cardiopulmonary resuscitation at birth receive chest compression using a 3-Compression to 1-Ventilation (3:1 C:V) ratio. However, the optimal chest compression technique during cardiopulmonary resuscitation is uncertain and identified as a critical gap in evidence. The International Consensus Statement advises to use the 3:1 C:V ratio based on animal studies, and states that there are no clinical trials to support this approach and called for more research. There continues to be uncertainty about the optimal chest compression technique during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. This trial will compare if in newborn infants with cardiac arrest in the delivery room does providing CC+SI (a new chest compression technique) compared to 3:1 C:V decreases the incidence of all mortality within the initial hospital stay. This will be a multi-centre international cluster randomized trial.

Key facts

Study ID
NCT06577818
Run by
University of Alberta
People needed
554
Starts
2026-09-01
Expected to finish
2033-07-01
Last updated by the study team
2026-05-04

Who can join

Age: any. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.