Acetazolamide Versus Dapagliflozin in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Patients

Recruiting now · Phase 3

Conditions studied: Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

In brief

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness of acetazolamide versus dapagliflozin as an add-on in treating acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) in adult patients with clinical signs of volume overload requiring intravenous loop diuretics. It will also assess the safety of these drugs when added to standard care. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does acetazolamide or dapagliflozin lead to a greater reduction in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels? * Which drug results in better loop diuretic efficiency, as measured by weight loss per 40 mg of intravenous furosemide or equivalent? We will compare acetazolamide to dapagliflozin, both added to standard intravenous loop diuretic therapy, to see which is more effective in decongesting patients with ADHF. Participants will: * Take either acetazolamide or dapagliflozin orally every day for 3 days * Receive intravenous loop diuretics as part of standard care * Undergo regular assessments of heart failure symptoms, weight, and laboratory tests * Be followed up until hospital discharge and for 30 days after starting the study

Key facts

Study ID
NCT06535529
Run by
Helwan University
People needed
60
Starts
2024-08-24
Expected to finish
2025-09-01
Last updated by the study team
2024-08-05

Who can join

Age: 18 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.