Immediate vs Conventional Loading for Early Implant Placement

Recruiting now · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Dental Implant

In brief

The goal of this study is to assess clinical, radiological and patient centred outcomes of immediate and conventional implant loading protocols, and to compare clinical outcomes of these two different loading protocols (immediate and conventional) in combination with early implant placement of single implants in the esthetic zone of maxilla.

Key facts

Study ID

NCT06526351

Run by

University of Belgrade

People needed

50

Starts

2024-03-29

Expected to finish

2027-03-01

Last updated by the study team

2024-07-29

Who can join

Age: 18 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: accepted.

You may qualify if…

• Single failing tooth in the esthetic zone of maxilla (second premolar to second premolar)
• Patients older than 18 years
• Healthy patients ASA I and II
• Non-smokers/Light smokers (<10 cigarettes per day)
• Adequate bone volume apical and palatal to the failing tooth to allow for sufficient primary - implant stability of regular diameter implant

You may not qualify if…

• Implants adjacent to the failing teeth
• Active periodontal infection
• Severe bruxism
• Systemic or local conditions that contraindicates dental implant surgery - Heavy smokers (>10 cigarettes per day)

Where it is running

• Implant Center, School of Dental Medicine, Univeristy of Blegrade — Belgrade, Serbia (enrolling)

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.